The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced us many harsh classes. Importantly, it has proven us how straightforward it’s to fabricate panic and management total populations by way of misleading means. Topping the checklist of misleading methods is using a take a look at that falsely labels wholesome people as sick and infectious. This permits mass testing to drive the narrative that we’re in a deadly pandemic.
Of course, I am speaking concerning the now notorious reverse transcription polymerase chain response (RT-PCR) take a look at. The actual fact is, the PCR take a look at is just not designed to be used as a diagnostic device because it can’t distinguish between inactive viruses and “dwell” or reproductive ones.1
It is a essential level, since inactive and reproductive viruses are usually not interchangeable when it comes to infectivity. You probably have a nonreproductive virus in your physique, you’ll not get sick and you can not unfold it to others. Secondly, many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many instances, which ends up in wholesome folks testing “constructive.”
The Essential Element That Nullifies Most PCR Take a look at Outcomes
The video above explains how the PCR take a look at works and the way we’re decoding outcomes incorrectly. In abstract, the PCR swab collects RNA out of your nasal cavity. This RNA is then reverse transcribed into DNA. Resulting from its tiny measurement, it have to be amplified to grow to be discernible. Every spherical of amplification is known as a cycle, and the variety of amplification cycles utilized by any given take a look at or lab is known as a cycle threshold (CT).
The upper the CT, the higher the danger that insignificant sequences of viral DNA find yourself being magnified to the purpose that the take a look at reads constructive even when your viral load is extraordinarily low or the virus is inactive and poses no risk to you or anybody else.
Many scientists have famous that something over 35 cycles is scientifically indefensible.2,3,4 A September 28, 2020, examine5 in Medical Infectious Ailments revealed that once you run a PCR take a look at at a CT of 35 or larger, the accuracy drops to three%, leading to a 97% false constructive fee.
But, a take a look at often called the Corman-Drosten paper and exams really helpful by the World Well being Group are set to 45 cycles,6,7,8 and the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration and the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention advocate operating PCR exams at a CT of 40.9
The query is why, contemplating the consensus is that CTs over 35 render the take a look at ineffective. When labs use these extreme cycle thresholds, you clearly find yourself with a grossly overestimated variety of constructive exams, so what we’re actually coping with is a “casedemic”10,11 — an epidemic of false positives.
Many are actually questioning whether or not this was executed on objective to crash the worldwide financial system and present cowl for the implementation of what is often called the Nice Reset, which is nothing lower than a worldwide totalitarian takeover by unelected technocrats who search to gobble up all of the world’s property.
Certainly, it appears fairly clear we’re not coping with a deadly pandemic in any actual sense. Mortality statistics additional show that is the case, as total mortality statistics have remained steady in 2020 and according to earlier years.12,13,14
In different phrases, persons are dying from COVID-19, sure, however the sickness is just not killing an extra variety of folks. The identical variety of folks would have died anyway, from one thing. Certainly, CDC information15 launched August 26, 2020, confirmed solely 6% of so-called COVID-19 deaths had COVID-19 listed as the only trigger on the loss of life certificates.
“For deaths with circumstances or causes as well as to COVID-19, on common, there have been 2.6 extra circumstances or causes per loss of life,” the CDC said, and any a type of comorbidities may have killed these folks even when COVID-19 was nonexistent.
For Accuracy, A lot Decrease CTs Should Be Used
Now, if CTs above 35 are scientifically unjustified, simply how low of a CT ought to be used? Fairly a few research have investigated this, so there is no scarcity of information at this level. The truth that the WHO, FDA and CDC nonetheless haven’t modified their CTs downward in gentle of all these information tells us they are not serious about getting an correct image of the an infection fee.
For instance, an April 2020 examine16 within the European Journal of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Ailments confirmed that to get 100% confirmed actual positives, the PCR take a look at have to be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically.
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy fee is a mere 20%, which means 80% are false positives. Past 34 cycles, your probability of a constructive PCR take a look at being a true constructive shrinks to zero.
Extra not too long ago, a December 3, 2020, systematic evaluate17 revealed within the journal of Medical Infectious Ailments assessed the findings of 29 totally different research — all of which had been revealed in 2020 — evaluating proof of SARS-CoV-2 an infection with the CTs utilized in testing.
As reported by the authors, “12 research reported that CT values had been considerably decrease … in specimens producing dwell virus tradition.” In different phrases, the upper the CT, the decrease the possibility of a constructive take a look at truly being as a result of presence of dwell (and infectious) virus.
“Two research reported the chances of dwell virus tradition lowered by roughly 33% for each one unit improve in CT,” the authors famous. Importantly, 5 of the research included had been unable to determine any dwell viruses in circumstances the place a constructive PCR take a look at had used a CT above 24. What’s extra, so as to produce dwell virus tradition, a affected person whose PCR take a look at used a CT at or above 35 needed to be symptomatic.
So, to summarize, in case you have signs of COVID-19 and take a look at constructive utilizing a PCR take a look at that was run at 35 amplification cycles or larger, then you’re prone to be contaminated and infectious.
Nevertheless, should you don’t have signs, but take a look at constructive utilizing a PCR take a look at run at 35 CTs or larger, then it’s probably a false constructive and also you pose no threat to others as you are unlikely to hold any dwell virus. In actual fact, offered you are asymptomatic, you are unlikely to be infectious even should you take a look at constructive with a take a look at run at 24 CTs or larger.
Fearmongering Success Hinges on Incorrect Use of PCR Take a look at
The video above contains a number of interviews with specialists who’ve overtly criticized using PCR testing to diagnose infections similar to COVID-19. These embody:
The inventor of the PCR take a look at, the late Kary Mullis (he has spoken concerning the take a look at for different infections, similar to HIV, however died in August 2019, a number of months earlier than the COVID-19 pandemic broke out)
Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug firm Pfizer
Professor Carl Heneghan, director of the Oxford College Middle for Proof-Based mostly Medication
Emeritus professor of immunology Beda M. Stadler, former head of the Bern Institute of Immunology
Clare Craig, a marketing consultant pathologist
Stephen A. Bustin, professor of molecular medication and a world-renowned knowledgeable on the PCR take a look at
In 1993, Mullis spoke about using the PCR take a look at to diagnose HIV. He defined that every one the take a look at does is amplify molecules into one thing you may detect, nevertheless it can’t let you know whether or not these particles truly pose a threat to your well being.
He additionally factors out that, utilizing PCR, you may basically discover absolutely anything in anybody as a result of most of us are strolling round with pathogens of all types, however the load is both too low to be of concern or the particles are simply useless particles that pose no threat.
Bustin factors out that once you get a constructive end result utilizing a CT of 35 or larger, you are wanting on the equal of a single copy of viral DNA. The probability of that inflicting a well being drawback is minuscule. Even Dr. Anthony Fauci has admitted that utilizing a PCR take a look at with a CT above 35 renders it kind of ineffective as a result of at that time, you are simply detecting useless nucelotides. No dwell virus could be detected at CTs that top.
Deadly Errors Present in Paper on Which PCR Testing Is Based mostly
November 30, 2020, a group of 22 worldwide scientists revealed a evaluate18 difficult the scientific paper19 on PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., and Victor Corman. The Corman-Drosten paper was shortly accepted by the WHO and the workflow described therein was adopted as the usual the world over.
Based on Reiner Fuellmich,20 founding member of the German Corona Further-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss,21 or ACU),22,23 Drosten is a key offender within the COVID-19 pandemic hoax.
The scientists demand the Corman-Drosten paper be retracted as a consequence of “deadly errors,”24 considered one of which is the truth that it was written (and the take a look at itself developed) earlier than any viral isolate was accessible. All they used was the genetic sequence revealed on-line by Chinese language scientists in January 2020.
The truth that the paper was revealed a mere 24 hours after it was submitted additionally suggests it did not even endure peer evaluate. In an Undercover DC interview, Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of many 22 scientists who are actually demanding the paper’s retraction, said:25
“Each scientific rationale for the event of that take a look at has been completely destroyed by this paper. It is like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID take a look at.
When Drosten developed the take a look at, China hadn’t given them a viral isolate. They developed the take a look at from a sequence in a gene financial institution. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They’d a code, however no physique for the code. No viral morphology.
Within the fish market, it is like providing you with a number of bones and saying ‘that is your fish.’ It might be any fish … Hear, the Corman-Drosten paper, there’s nothing from a affected person in it. It is all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren’t there they made up.
They synthetically created them to fill within the blanks. That is what genetics is; it is a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and also you’re lacking some, what you suppose is EEE, so you set it in … That is principally a pc virus.
There are 10 deadly errors on this Drosten take a look at paper … However right here is the underside line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they had been doing. The PCR merchandise of the amplification did not correspond to any viral isolate at the moment. I name it ‘donut ring science.’ There’s nothing on the middle of it. It is all about code, genetics, nothing to do with actuality …
There have since been papers saying they’ve produced viral isolates. However there are not any controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July … the place they stated: ‘This is the viral isolate.’ Have you learnt what they did? They swabbed one particular person. One particular person, who’d been to China and had chilly signs. One particular person. And so they assumed he had [COVID-19] to start with. So, it is all filled with holes, the entire thing.“
The conclusion of the evaluate reads, partly:26
“A call to acknowledge the errors obvious within the Corman-Drosten paper has the profit to enormously reduce human price and struggling going ahead. Is it not in the very best curiosity of Eurosurveillance to retract this paper? Our conclusion is obvious. Within the face of all of the large PCR-protocol design flaws and errors described right here, we conclude: There’s not a lot of a selection left within the framework of scientific integrity and accountability.”
The critique in opposition to PCR testing is additional strengthened by a November 20, 2020, examine27 in Nature Communications, which discovered no viable virus in PCR-positive circumstances at all. The examine evaluated information from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between Might 14 and June 1, 2020.
A complete of 300 examined constructive however had no signs. Of the 34,424 folks with a historical past of COVID-19, 107 examined constructive a second time. But, once they did virus cultures on these 407 people who had examined constructive (both for the first or second time), no dwell virus was present in any of them!
Antibody Assessments Are Equally Unreliable
Antibody exams are additionally turning out to have their share of high quality issues. You probably have antibodies in opposition to SARS-CoV-2, that may be proof that your immune system efficiently overcame the virus sooner or later prior to now. Nevertheless, the COVID-19 antibody take a look at can also prove constructive in case you have antibodies in opposition to frequent chilly viruses.
June 30, 2020, the CDC admitted that prior publicity to coronaviruses answerable for the frequent chilly may end up in a constructive COVID-19 antibody take a look at, even should you’ve by no means been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2 particularly.28
The saving grace is that research29,30,31 recommend antibodies produced following publicity to coronaviruses that trigger the frequent chilly additionally seem to offer some normal and long-lasting resistance in opposition to SARS-CoV-2.
One such examine,32,33 revealed Might 14, 2020, within the journal Cell, discovered 70% of samples from sufferers who had recovered from delicate circumstances of COVID-19 had resistance to SARS-CoV-2 on the T-cell stage, as did 40% to 60% of individuals who had not been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2.
Based on the authors, this implies there’s “cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating ‘frequent chilly’ coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2.” In different phrases, should you’ve recovered from a typical chilly attributable to a specific coronavirus, your humoral immune system might activate once you encounter SARS-CoV-2, thus rendering you immune to COVID-19.
One other examine34 found SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies are solely present in essentially the most extreme circumstances — about 1 in 5. So, a damaging antibody take a look at does not essentially rule out the chance that you’ve got been contaminated and did not get sick. In actual fact, this discovering suggests COVID-19 might truly be 5 instances extra prevalent than suspected — and 5 instances much less lethal than predicted.
In a letter to the editor35 revealed within the July 1, 2020, difficulty of American Household Doctor, Drs. Mark Ebell, deputy editor for evidence-based medication for the journal, and Henry Barry, reviewed among the accessible information, noting that:
“When assessing whether or not sufferers had a earlier an infection and could also be immune, it is very important keep away from false-positives in order that sufferers don’t suppose they’re immune when they aren’t.
Desk 1 summarizes the false-positive charges at numerous inhabitants prevalence for the Cellex take a look at and for a hypothetical take a look at that’s 90% delicate and 99% particular. At comparatively low inhabitants prevalences, which probably mirror present circumstances in the USA and elsewhere, we might argue that false-positive charges are unacceptably excessive with the Cellex take a look at.”
Ebell and Barry identified that lots of the antibody exams which have provisional approval from the FDA nonetheless haven’t even been evaluated for accuracy. Additionally they really helpful that labs report take a look at outcomes “in a method that displays the native inhabitants prevalence primarily based on widespread testing and embody the false-positive fee,” as this data “is required to assist household physicians higher inform shared decision-making relating to earlier an infection and return to work or faculty.”
At current, you’d be hard-pressed to seek out anybody together with that information of their reporting, and the method issues are going, I would not maintain my breath in anticipation of such useful numbers being included sooner or later both.
Excessive Time to Finish Mass Testing Rip-off
If the huge majority of people that take a look at constructive for COVID-19 an infection don’t have any signs, do not feel sick and do not look sick, is COVID-19 actually a “lethal” illness? Or, is it extra like HPV — a viral an infection that most individuals have with out figuring out it, and which 90% are in a position to get rid of with out remedy?
The first justification for the tyrannical governmental interventions of COVID-19 was to sluggish the unfold of the an infection in order that hospital sources wouldn’t be overwhelmed, inflicting folks to die as a consequence of lack of medical care.
These interventions weren’t about stopping the unfold altogether and even lowering the variety of folks that may finally get contaminated. They definitely had been by no means meant to forestall all loss of life. Any rational evaluation would quickly conclude that this merely is not potential, below any circumstance.
Brief-term stay-at-home orders and enterprise closings had been solely meant to decelerate the unfold so that, finally, naturally-acquired herd immunity — the very best variety — would stop it from reemerging. But the aim posts hold shifting as we go alongside.
Two-week lockdowns was months in some areas. Ultimately, we had been informed every thing would return to regular as quickly as a vaccine grew to become accessible. However as soon as the vaccines began rolling out, the narrative modified once more, and we had been informed we might nonetheless want masks, social distancing and lockdowns nicely into 2021 and even 2022 even with a vaccine. What, precisely, is occurring?
The one rational purpose for why authorities interventions proceed is as a result of they’re meant to erode our private freedoms and civil liberties and switch wealth to unelected technocrats who’re controlling the pandemic narrative. It is all fearmongering primarily based on a mixture of wildly manipulated information and flawed exams.
Except for PCR testing information, there is no proof of a deadly pandemic in any respect. As talked about, whereas there’s such a factor as COVID-19, and folks have and do die from it, there are not any extra deaths as a consequence of it.36,37,38 The whole mortality for 2020 is regular.
So, except we suppose we should always shut down the world and cease dwelling as a result of folks die from coronary heart illness, diabetes, most cancers, the flu or anything, then there is no purpose to close down the world as a result of some folks occur to die from COVID-19.
What You Can Do
The excellent news is the hoax is beginning to be uncovered. In November 2020, a Portuguese appeals courtroom dominated39,40 that the PCR take a look at is “not a dependable take a look at for SARS-CoV-2” and that “a single constructive PCR take a look at can’t be used as an efficient analysis of an infection.” Subsequently, “any enforced quarantine primarily based on the outcomes is illegal.”41 The courtroom additionally famous that forcing wholesome folks to self-isolate might be a violation of their elementary proper to liberty.
As detailed in “Coronavirus Fraud Scandal — The Largest Combat Has Simply Begun” and “German Legal professionals Provoke Class-Motion Coronavirus Litigation,” extra authorized circumstances are additionally to be anticipated, all of which is able to assist expose the fraud perpetrated. As for what you can do within the meantime, take into account:
- Turning off mainstream media information and turning to unbiased specialists — do the analysis. Learn by way of the science.
- Proceed to counter the censorship by asking questions — arm your self with mortality statistics and the information on PCR testing, so you may clarify how and why this pandemic merely is not a pandemic anymore.
- If you’re a medical skilled, particularly should you’re a member of an expert society, write an open letter to your authorities, urging them to talk to and heed suggestions from unbiased specialists.
- Signal The Nice Barrington Declaration,42 which requires an finish to lockdowns.
- Be part of a gaggle so that you simply can have help — Examples of teams fashioned to battle in opposition to authorities overreach embody Us for Them, a gaggle campaigning for reopening faculties and defending kids’s rights within the U.Ok., and the Freedom to Breathe Company, a U.S. group of attorneys, docs, enterprise homeowners and oldsters who’re combating to guard freedom and liberty.