Hong Kong Whistleblower Alleges COVID-19 Cowl-Up


The controversy in regards to the origin of SARS-CoV-2 continues, as does the talk over whether or not the pandemic may have been quashed had Chinese language authorities acted and shared details about the outbreak sooner.

In keeping with a Hong Kong whistleblower scientist who has fled to the U.S., the Chinese language authorities and World Well being Group representatives in Hong Kong lined up the Wuhan outbreak, permitting it to unfold unchecked around the globe.

Within the featured Fox Information interview, the whistleblower, Dr. Li-Meng Yan — who labored on the College of Hong Kong College of Public Well being, a prime coronavirus analysis lab — claims her early investigation into the SARS-like outbreak in Wuhan may have helped forestall a worldwide pandemic from creating, had her supervisors shared her findings.

Yan claims her supervisor, WHO marketing consultant Leo Poon, requested her to, secretly, examine stories of a SARS-like sickness spreading in Wuhan, China, in late December 2019. The Chinese language authorities had refused abroad specialists from getting concerned, and Poon wished her to determine what was actually occurring.

Human-to-Human Unfold Was Acknowledged From the Begin

Yan, who has {many professional} colleagues in China, turned to a good friend who works within the Chinese language Heart for Illness Management and Prevention and had first-hand details about the outbreak. Yan was instructed there was doubtless human-to-human transmission occurring, as that they had discovered household clusters of instances.

The WHO, in the meantime, didn’t affirm the human-to-human unfold potential for a number of weeks. On the opposite, an official WHO assertion mentioned the virus “doesn’t transmit readily between folks.” In a Tweet, WHO additionally said that preliminary investigations by Chinese language authorities “discovered no clear proof of human-to-human transmission.”

January 16, 2020, Yan was once more requested to achieve out to her contacts in China to see if she may study extra. Her CDC contacts have been fearful, but it surely grew to become clear that sufferers and front-line medical doctors weren’t being correctly protected, and that Chinese language authorities have been attempting to maintain a lid on the circulate of data.

When she up to date Poon, he instructed her to remain silent and never cross the Chinese language authorities, or else they’d each be “disappeared.” Yan felt it was essential to tell the public, however Poon took no motion. The co-director of the College of Hong Kong College of Public Well being laboratory, professor Malik Peiris, additionally stayed quiet.

Yan believes WHO colluded with the China Communist Social gathering (CCP) authorities to forestall info in regards to the virus from popping out. The WHO fairly predictably denies her claims.

Yan describes how, since her escape, the CCP has been attempting to smear her title and wreck her skilled repute, saying she’s been kidnapped by People, and even that she has a psychological dysfunction. Her skilled webpages and affiliations have been deleted and eliminated.

Yan Would not Present Any Stunning Revelations

On the entire, although, Yan would not actually inform us something we did not already know. It has been clear that China delayed telling the general public in regards to the Wuhan outbreak. She would not point out having any details about the virus’ origin, and she or he actually doesn’t present any helpful suggestions for the way to shield ourselves.

In truth, she parrots the suggestions of most governments — staying 6 toes aside, utilizing alcohol-based disinfectants and sporting surgical masks. Other than disinfectants, which can be helpful for killing viruses on fingers and surfaces, social distancing and masks sporting don’t have any foundation in precise science.

You possibly can study extra about these two interventions in “Why Social Distancing Ought to Not Be the New Regular” and “Conclusive Proof — Masks Do Not Inhibit Viral Unfold.”

In fact, the Chinese language have been recognized to put on face masks in public for a while, however they’ve primarily been worn to guard the wearer in opposition to air air pollution1,2 — not infectious illness. Simply because masks forestall inhalation of harmful air air pollution doesn’t imply they work in opposition to viruses.

Primarily based on present knowledge, Yan additionally appears to magnify the risks of the virus, seeing how the COVID-19 mortality fee is now right down to a fraction of a p.c and a overwhelming majority — about 90% — of these contaminated stay fully asymptomatic.

All of that mentioned, she’s actually appropriate when saying that the CCP’s makes an attempt to maintain particulars of the Wuhan outbreak from the general public allowed the virus to unfold, not solely via China but additionally internationally.

SARS-CoV-2 Did Not Evolve Naturally, Scientists Say

With regard to the origin of SARS-CoV-2, scientists maintain discovering extra clues indicating it is not a naturally-evolved virus. Amongst them are two current papers by Norwegian and British researchers Sørensen, Susrud and Dalgleish.

Within the first paper,3 “A Candidate Vaccine for Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2) Developed from Evaluation of its Common Methodology of Motion for Infectivity,” revealed within the journal Quarterly Evaluate of Biophysics Discovery, they declare to have recognized inserted sections within the spike floor that permits it to bind to and enter human cells.

In accordance to the authors, “The SARS-CoV-2 spike is considerably totally different from another SARS that we now have studied.” 

The second paper,4 “The Proof Which Suggests That This Is No Naturally Advanced Virus: A Reconstructed Historic Aetiology of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike,” revealed by the Norwegian periodical Minerva,5,6 July 13, 2020, presents a number of arguments for why SARS-CoV-2 is more likely to have been manipulated within the lab.

As within the first paper, the researchers stress anomalies within the spike protein of the virus. The summary reads, partly:7

“… SARS-CoV-2 is possessed of twin motion functionality … The probability of this being the results of pure processes could be very small. The spike has six inserts that are distinctive fingerprints with 5 salient options indicative of purposive manipulation.

We then add to the bio-chemistry a diachronic dimension by analysing a sequence of 4 linked revealed analysis initiatives which, we propose, present by deduction how, the place, when and by whom the SARS-CoV-2 Spike acquired its particular traits. This reconstructed historic aetiology meets the standards of means, timing, agent and place to produce enough confidence to reverse the burden of proof.

Henceforth, those that would preserve that the COVID-19 pandemic arose from zoonotic switch want to elucidate exactly why this extra parsimonious account is fallacious earlier than asserting that their proof is persuasive, most particularly when, as we additionally present, there are puzzling errors of their use of proof.”

US-China Collaborated on Coronavirus Analysis

Sørensen additionally highlights open supply research describing the creation of recent chimeraviruses which have SARS-coronavirus as a base. For instance, researchers have exchanged properties between bat coronaviruses and human SARS viruses. So, there might be little doubt that the expertise and know-how exists.
Minerva reporter Aksel Fridstrom writes:8

“Moreover, Sørensen’s article factors to the incontrovertible fact that Wuhan’s Virology Institute once more in 2010 took half in gain-of-function experiments with worldwide collaborators, the place SARS-coronavirus was supplied with further properties that improve the virus’s potential to contaminate people.”

In that analysis, an HIV pseudovirus was used to specific seven bat ACE2 receptors. The binding properties of those bat ACE2 receptors have been in comparison with human ACE2 receptors in order to find out which one would have the best potential to bind to and infect human cells.

The worldwide collaborators on this case included researchers on the College of North Carolina. 5 years later, in 2015, the College of North Carolina once more collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, performing gain-of-function analysis wherein bat viruses have been manipulated to create a chimeric virus able to binding to human higher airway cells. That individual virus was referred to as SHC014-MA15.

“Sørensen and his co-authors write that this work created ‘a chimeric virus with very excessive infectivity potential focused to the human higher respiratory tract’ and that what’s being described is ‘in truth, exactly SARS-CoV-2 properties,'” Fridstrom writes.9

Virus Origin Papers Are Being Shunned by Scientific Journals

One of many causes Sørensen, Susrud and Dalgleish selected to publish their science paper in {a magazine} fairly than a scientific journal is due to the problem getting papers in regards to the virus’ origin revealed. There’s great stigma connected to this matter.

The journal Nature was lately caught blocking accounts of individuals questioning the pure origin of SARS-CoV-2 on Twitter, and a number of other papers discussing the lab origin concept or proposing genetic engineering are languishing on preprint servers, seemingly unable to get accepted for formal publication. A number of such papers are talked about in a July 16, 2020, GM Watch article.10

Sørensen, Susrud and Dalgleish had additionally already gotten the runaround on their first paper. Each the Journal of Virology and Nature rejected it, stating it was “unsuitable for publication.” It was finally accepted by Quarterly Evaluate of Biophysics Discovery, a journal chaired by Stanford College and College of Dundee scientists.

Why COVID-19 Vaccines Are Prone to Fail

Importantly, in “A Candidate Vaccine for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) Developed from Evaluation of its Common Methodology of Motion for Infectivity,”11 Sorensen et.al. warn that present efforts to develop a COVID-19 vaccine are more likely to fail because the etiology of the virus has been misunderstood:12

These knowledge reveal the organic construction of SARS-CoV-2 Spike and ensure that collected cost from inserts and salt bridges are in floor positions able to binding with cell membrane parts aside from the ACE2 receptor.

We have now additionally regarded on the bare coronavirus spike protein as an idea for the premise of a vaccine, which we have rejected due to excessive threat of contamination with human-like epitopes.

Evaluation of the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 reveals 78.4% similarity with human-like (HL) epitopes. For the avoidance of confusion, a normal protein blast searches for functionalities and homologies to different proteins.

Nonetheless, antibodies can solely acknowledge 5-6 amino acids and due to this fact a 6 amino acid rolling window seek for antibody epitopes was carried out.

A search so tailor-made to match in opposition to all human recognized proteins will give a 78.4% human similarity to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein, i.e if all epitopes on the 1255 amino acid lengthy SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein can be utilized by antibodies then there shall be 983 antibody binding websites which additionally may bind to epitopes on human proteins.

That is what we did and located … [I]n the current context, any vaccine design primarily based on the entire Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 might not be immunogenic due its excessive human similarity in comparison with a vaccine with particularly chosen NHL epitopes, comparable to Biovacc-19 does — and is.

COVID-19 candidate vaccines designed with out appreciating these issues might run comparable dangers to these skilled with HIV vaccines that failed to point out safety.

The opportunity of inducing autoimmune responses or antibody-dependent enhancements, must be fastidiously guarded in opposition to as a result of there’s revealed proof that an HIV candidate vaccine has really enhanced infectivity:

‘Vaccinations have been halted; contributors have been unblinded. In publish hoc analyses, extra HIV infections occurred in vaccinees vs placebo recipients in males who had Ad5-neutralizing antibodies and/or have been uncircumcised. Comply with-up was prolonged to evaluate relative threat of HIV acquisition in vaccinees vs placebo recipients over time.’

Such antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) has been noticed for coronaviruses in animal fashions, permitting them to enter cells expressing Fc𝛾R. ADE just isn’t absolutely understood: nevertheless, it’s instructed that antibody-dependent enhancements might come on account of amino acid variability and antigenic drift.”

Additionally they level out that selecting an adjuvant after the first vaccine design work has been accomplished, which is how vaccine growth is usually completed, could also be but one other severe mistake that might make a COVID-19 vaccine actually harmful.

Many Completely different Lab Origin Hypotheses Have Been Offered

One other scientist who questions the pure evolution concept is Jonathan Latham, Ph.D., a molecular biologist and virologist. In a June 2, 2020, Unbiased Science Information article,13 Latham and Allison Wilson, Ph.D., a geneticist, dissect the zoonotic origin concept, displaying the analysis merely doesn’t assist this declare.

Whereas they don’t dispute the concept that SARS-CoV-2 began out as a bat coronavirus in some unspecified time in the future, they dispute the mechanism by which it supposedly gained the power to contaminate people. In his article, Latham lays out a number of totally different lab origin hypotheses, that are additionally reviewed in my interview with him, featured in “Cowl-Up of SARS-CoV-2 Origin?”

Is SARS-CoV-2 Actually a Novel Virus?

Latham and Wilson proceed their seek for the fact in a July 15, 2020, Unbiased Science Information article.14

“… huge scientific consideration has been paid to the molecular character of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, together with its novel genome sequence compared with its close to kinfolk,” Latham writes.

“In stark distinction, nearly no consideration has been paid to the bodily provenance of these nearest genetic kinfolk, its presumptive ancestors, that are two viral sequences named BtCoV/4991 and RaTG13.”

In keeping with Latham, SARS-CoV-2 might not be an solely novel virus in spite of everything. A extremely conserved shut ancestor, BtCoV/4991, has been listed within the database for seven years and has been featured within the revealed literature. When the Wuhan lab later resequenced this pattern, they merely renamed it, thereby obscuring its historical past.

As Latham explains in his article15 — which I encourage you to learn in its entirety — BtCoV/4991 was present in samples collected in a mineshaft in Yunnan province, China in 2012-2013.

The samples have been collected after six miners contracted an odd respiratory sickness that sound remarkably comparable if not an identical to COVID-19. Three of them died. Whereas the illness had solely been described in a Chinese language thesis written by the physician who handled the miners, Latham had the thesis translated into English.

“The proof it comprises has led us to rethink every part we thought we knew in regards to the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic,” Latham writes.16 “It has additionally led us to theorize a believable route by which an apparently remoted illness outbreak in a mine in 2012 led to a worldwide pandemic in 2019.

The origin of SARS-CoV-2 that we suggest beneath is predicated on the case histories of those miners and their hospital remedy. This straightforward concept accounts for all the important thing options of the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus …”

Key options Latham and Wilson consider might be defined by their concept embrace:

  • The origin of the novel furin cleavage website on the virus’ spike protein that enhances its unfold within the human physique
  • The “distinctive affinity of the virus spike protein for human receptors”
  • The virus’ lack of evolution because the pandemic started
  • The cause SARS-CoV-2 targets the lungs

Whereas they do not declare SARS-CoV-2 was genetically engineered, they consider gain-of-function analysis carried out on the Wuhan Institute of Virology performed “a vital causative position within the pandemic.”

The Mojiang Miners Passage Speculation

Latham and Wilson go on to elucidate their speculation, which they’ve dubbed the Mojiang miners passage (MMP) speculation. Once more, I like to recommend studying the unique article, however to your edification, I’ve chosen to cite a bigger than typical part to summarize it for you:

“We advise, first, that contained in the miners RaTG13 (or a really comparable virus) developed into SARS-CoV-2, an unusually pathogenic coronavirus extremely tailored to people. Second, that the Shi lab used medical samples taken from the miners and despatched to them by Kunming College Hospital for his or her analysis. It was this human-adapted virus, now often called SARS-CoV-2­, that escaped from the WIV in 2019 …

Passaging is a normal virological approach for adapting viruses to new species, tissues, or cell sorts. It’s usually completed by intentionally infecting a brand new host species or a brand new host cell kind with a excessive dose of virus. This preliminary viral an infection would ordinarily die out as a result of the host’s immune system vanquishes the ill-adapted virus.

However, in passaging, earlier than it does die out a pattern is extracted and transferred to a brand new an identical tissue, the place viral an infection restarts. Completed iteratively, this method … intensively selects for viruses tailored to the new host or cell kind …

We agree that bizarre charges of evolution wouldn’t permit RaTG13 to evolve into SARS-CoV-2 however we additionally consider that situations contained in the lungs of the miners have been removed from bizarre. 5 main elements particular to the hospitalized miners favored a really excessive fee of evolution inside them.

The lungs of the miners, we propose, supported a really excessive viral load resulting in proportionately speedy viral evolution. Moreover, based on the Grasp’s thesis, the immune techniques of the miners have been compromised and remained so even for these discharged. This weak spot on the a part of the miners may additionally have inspired evolution of the virus …

In assist of the MMP concept we additionally know one thing in regards to the samples taken from the miners. In keeping with the Grasp’s thesis, samples have been taken from sufferers for ‘scientific analysis’ and blood samples (at the least) have been despatched to the WIV …

The logical course of such analysis could be to sequence viral RNA extracted instantly from unfrozen tissue or blood samples and/or to generate reside infectious clones for which it could be helpful (if not crucial) to amplify the virus by inserting it in human cell tradition. Both approach may have led to unintended an infection of a lab researcher …

We suggest that, when frozen samples derived from the miners have been finally opened within the Wuhan lab they have been already extremely tailored to people to an extent presumably not anticipated by the researchers. One small mistake or mechanical breakdown may have led on to the primary human an infection in late 2019.

Thus, certainly one of the miners, almost definitely affected person 3, or affected person 4 (whose thymus was eliminated), was successfully affected person zero of the COVID-19 epidemic. On this state of affairs, COVID-19 just isn’t an engineered virus; however, equally, if it had not been taken to Wuhan and no additional molecular analysis had been carried out or deliberate for it then the virus would have died out from pure causes, fairly than escaped to provoke the COVID-19 pandemic.”

As mentioned in “Bioweapon Labs Should Be Shut Down and Scientists Prosecuted,” the COVID-19 pandemic needs to be a wake-up name for the world to rethink the knowledge of gain-of-function analysis. Lab escapes are assured to happen, ultimately. We obtained fortunate this time, within the sense that SARS-CoV-2 is much much less lethal than initially feared. However the authorities response to the pandemic has been devastating.

World shut-downs have taken an enormous toll on psychological and monetary well being, to not point out the worldwide economic system as a complete. May we survive as a species if one thing with a extremely excessive lethality have been to get out? These are essential questions that deserve public dialogue and shut scrutiny by lawmakers.